Version , Change 1. Volume II: Architectural Data and Support for DoD key processes through DoDAF viewpoints Performers Data. DoDAF is the overarching, comprehensive framework and conceptual model enabling Guide: DoDAF Architecture Framework Version The Department of Defense Architecture Framework (DoDAF) is an architecture framework for . The current version is DoDAF DoDAF V is published on a public website. Other derivative frameworks based on DoDAF include the NATO.
|Published (Last):||15 July 2017|
|PDF File Size:||3.85 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||8.58 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
DoD Business Systems Modernization: Commons category link is on Wikidata. Product Descriptions” and a “Deskbook”. These architecture descriptions may include families of systems FoS ddoaf, systems of systems SoSand net-centric capabilities for interoperating and interacting in the non-combat environment.
Department of Defense Architecture Framework
The sequence of the artifacts listed below gives a suggested order in which the artifacts could be developed. There are many different approaches for creating an integrated architecture using DoDAF and for determining which products are required. The DM2 defines architectural data elements and enables the integration and federation of Architectural Descriptions.
Operational View OV products provide descriptions of the tasks and activities, operational elements, and information exchanges required to accomplish DoD missions. Department of Defense for developing enterprise architecture has been debated:.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. In April the Version 1. For the purposes of architecture development, the term integrated means that data required in more than one of the architectural models is commonly defined and understood across those models. The Department of Defense Architecture Framework DoDAF is an architecture framework for the United States Department of Defense DoD that provides visualization infrastructure for specific stakeholders concerns through viewpoints organized by various views.
This page was last edited on 3 Octoberat One concern about the DoDAF is how well these products meet actual stakeholder concerns for any given system of interest.
DoD weapons and information technology system acquisitions are required to develop and document an enterprise architecture EA using the views prescribed in the DoDAF.
Integrated architectures are a property or design principle for architectures at all levels: SV products focus on specific physical systems with specific physical geographical locations. The actual sequence of view generation and their potential customization is a function of the application domain and the specific needs of the effort.
The three views and their interrelationships — driven by common architecture data elements — provide the basis for deriving measures such as interoperability or performance, and for measuring the impact of the values of these metrics on operational mission and task effectiveness.
Technical standards view TV products define technical standards, implementation conventions, business rules and criteria that govern the architecture. In other projects Wikimedia Commons. The relationship between architecture data elements across the SV to the OV can be exemplified as systems are procured and fielded to support organizations and their operations. It addressed the Deputy Secretary of Defense directive that a DoD-wide effort be undertaken to define and develop a better means and process for ensuring that C4ISR capabilities were interoperable and met the needs of the warfighter.
The DoDAF provides a foundational framework for developing and representing architecture descriptions that ensure a common denominator for understanding, comparing, and integrating architectures across organizational, joint, and multinational boundaries.
These views are artifacts for visualizing, understanding, and assimilating the broad scope and complexities of an architecture description through tabularstructuralbehavioralontologicalpictorialtemporalgraphicalprobabilisticor alternative conceptual means.
The DoDAF deskbook provides examples in using traditional systems engineering and data engineering techniques, and secondly, UML format. It establishes a basis for semantic i. This document addressed usage, integrated architectures, DoD and Federal policies, value of architectures, architecture measures, DoD decision support processes, development techniques, analytical dodfa, and the CADM v1.
The developing system must not only meet its internal data needs but also those of the operational framework into which it is set.
It establishes data element definitions, rules, and relationships and a baseline set of products for consistent development of systems, integrated, or federated architectures. Retrieved from ” https: These views relate to stakeholder requirements for producing an Architectural Description. Each of these three levels of the DM2 is important to a particular viewer of Departmental processes:.
Only dpdaf subset of the full DoDAF viewset is usually created for each system development. The concept of capability, as defined by its Meta-model Data Group allows one to answer questions such as:. DoDAF generically describes in the representation of the artifacts to be generated, but allows considerable flexibility regarding the specific formats and modeling techniques.
The DoDAF Architecture Framework Version | CSIAC
As one example, the DoDAF v1. Views Read Edit View history.
Systems and services view SV is a set of graphical and textual products that dldaf systems and services and interconnections providing for, or supporting, DoD functions.
United States Department of Defense information technology Enterprise architecture frameworks. The approach depends on the requirements and the expected results; i. It defines the type of information exchanged, the frequency of exchanges, the tasks and activities supported by these exchanges and the nature of the exchanges.
DoDAF Architecting Overview – AcqNotes
As the DM2 matures to meet the ongoing data requirements of process owners, decision makers, architects, and new technologies, it will evolve to a resource that more completely supports the requirements for architectural data, published in a consistently understandable way, and will enable greater ease for discovering, sharing, and reusing architectural data across organizational boundaries.
In this manner, the DM2 supports the exchange and reuse of architectural information among JCAs, Components, and Federal and Coalition partners, thus facilitating the understanding and implementation of interoperability of processes and systems. To facilitate the use of information at the data layer, the DoDAF describes a set of models for visualizing data through graphic, tabular, or textual means.
Each view depicts certain perspectives of an architecture as described below. The figure represents the information that links the operational view, systems and services view, and technical dodaaf view. The OV provides textual and graphical representations of operational nodes and elements, assigned tasks and activities, and information flows between nodes. In simpler terms, integration is seen in dovaf connection from items common among architecture products, where items shown in one architecture product such as sites used or systems interfaced or services provided should have the identical number, name, and meaning appear in related architecture product views.